LUNAR COORDINATES OF THE ALIEN SPACESHIP AND FEATURE OF THE FERMI WALLED PLANE
THE LM-15 FLYOVER SPREAD BY W. RUTLEDGE SHOWS ALMOST CERTAINLY THE FERMI WALLED PLANE, CLOSE TO THE IZSAK CRATER
THE LM-15 FLYOVER AND THE FAR SIDE OF THE MOON
What can we understand about the astonishing footage of the presumed
LM-15 flyover before descent on "Izsak D", spread on YouTube by William
Rutledge on May 4, 2007? Is there any congruence between the visible
details shown in the video footage and any lunar map of the far side of
the Moon? For example, are recognizable the Fermi's details, or is
recognizable any particular belonging to the lunar zone of the backside
of the Moon, near the Izsak crater? In the comment posted by W.
Rutledge ("retiredafb") on YouTube, we can read: <<[...] LM
passes over Tsiolkovski, Fermi, Delporte and Lukte before passing on
the Izsak Y crater. [...] CDR communicates the South -East coordinates
of the major parts of the spaceship, approximately 4 kilometers long.>>
A friend of mine from New York City pointed
out months ago that, first of all, it would be a good result
understanding if the LM-15 flyover really took place on the far side of
the Moon, and moreover if there is any other video footage from NASA
space missions which shows those surface details of the Moon.
What I have found is that there are some congruences if we compare the
details shown in the frames of the LM-15 flyover footage, with an
official lunar map available on the Lunar and Planetary Institute: the
i_136_m.jpg picture which shows clearly the lunar details mentioned by
William Rutledge: we have the Tsiolkovsky crater, the Lutke crater, and
we can see the Delporte and the Izsak craters. Of course, it is visible
also the large lunar crater by the name of Fermi, close to all the
others and which belongs to the category named a walled plain.
SOME FEATURES OF THE FERMI WALLED PLANE SEEM RECOGNIZABLE IN THE PRESUMED LM-15 FLYOVER
The Fermi walled plane has a diameter of about 183 km. During the
presumed LM-15 flyover, the CDR (Commander) of the crew <<[...]
communicates the South -East coordinates of the major parts of the
spaceship, approximately 4 kilometers long. Color distortions are
caused by the rotating wheel inside the Westinghouse Color TV
What I asked to myself was if the there were something
of recognizable. I watched very carefully the video footage entitled
<<ALIEN SPACESHIP ON THE MOON flyover bef. landing APOLLO
20>>. The video footage lasts 5 minutes and 53 seconds. At a
certain point I could recognize what, in my opinion, is the western
border of the Fermi crater (a walled plane). It seems that the
direction of the LM-15 is from Northeast to Southwest. As a matter of
fact, when you watch the footage you should recognize the details of
the western Fermi rocky border, high on the left of the screen,
approximately after 2 minutes and 30 seconds from the beginning. The
subititles of the footage which would be the radio communications
between the Vandenberg AFB and the LM-15, say:
<< [...] Izsak is
visible on the upper left side of the window [...]>>, a statement
from the astronauts which is coherent with their position, with their
route and with the features of the lunar surface visible during the
In a former point of the footage
in the subtitles of the dialogues among the CDR and the Vandenberg AFB,
we can read: <<We passed over Tsiolkovsky, and we are over Fermi
Again, it is a statement coherent with the fact that
the two astronauts inside the LM-15 (W. Rutledge and A. Leonov) should
be able to see on the lunar horizon the Izsak crater, on the upper left
side of the window of their spacecraft. Now we can pay attention to the
frames of the video footage. So, it is enough to take a couple of
snapshots of the video footage, and rotating of 90° to the left. You
will have, for example, the following frame: ILL.3.
First of all, with a free software (the Gimp software, version 2.2.10)
we can delete the information of the colours; we can get the following
And then we can change the brightness contrast of the picture:
Now, we can compare our little work with a detail of thei_136_m.jpg
(changed in contrast), from the Lunar and Planetary Institute
of the i-:136_m.jpg, Courtesy NASA/LPI
Same detail, but changed in contrast
The rotated frame from the
footage of the LM-15
if the lunar zone is the same, because the shot equipment is different
as well the date, the Sun position, the altitude of the spacecracft
from which the shot was taken, it is obvious that we cannot have the
same image results. But it is very interesting that we can
still recognize some paths in both pictures. So, almost
certainly, we can say that at least the first minutes of the flyover
are a really flyover of the backside of the Moon, over the Fermi walled
plane and just close to the Izsak crater.
LUNAR COORDINATES OF THE ALIEN SPACESHIP ARE
CONSISTENT WITH THE POSITION OF THE STRANGE OBJECT VISIBLE IN OFFICIAL
William Rutledge revealed that one target
of the mission was landing by "Izsak D". I could not find any reference
to that presumed particular Moon structure mentioned by him. I can
suppose it is a Moon detail very close to the Izsak crater, and named
like that by some space specialists involved in classified missions.
But what about the the South -East coordinates of the major parts of
the spaceship? Can we get any information from the coordinates provided
by William Rutledge, Apollo 20 CDR? The subtitles of the footage report
the following data about the spaceship position: for the spaceship nose
we have 17.3deg S and 117.62 deg E, and for the spaceship cockpit we
have 17.25 deg S and 117.62 deg E. So, it means that the presumed alien
spacecraft is leant by the North-South axis, because what changes is
the lunar latitude, while the lunar longitude of the two parts of the
spaceship does not change. Moreover, the data tell us that the nose
should be to the North of the cockpit.
THE ALIEN SPACECRAFT'S POSITION REGARDS AS THE IZSAK CRATER AND "IZSAK D"
William Rutledge in his comments on YouTube gave us some information
about "Izsak D" (where the alien spaceship was): it is to Southwest of
Delporte Crater. If you combine that information with the following:
<<DELPORTE, SOUTHWEST OF IZSAK, NORTH OF>> (from the
AS15-P-9630 data, Apollo Image Atlas, NASA/LPI), we can
understand that the spaceship is to North of Izsak, because in that
NASA picture the presumed alien spacecraft is visible. Again,
Rutledge's information are coherent with the position of the huge
object visible in the official NASA pictures (taken from Apollo 15-17
missions). But for having the right position of the NASA picture as
regards the lunar coordinates (latitute and longitude), we have to
rotate of 90° to the left one of the NASA images of that lunar zone.
If, for instance, we choose the AS15-M-1333 picture, we can get the
following perspective: the illustration number 5 (ILL.5).
think that the operation is correct because I have compared the result
to the already discussed i_136_m.jpg picture (from the Lunar and
Planetary Institute) which shows clearly the lunar details
mentioned by William Rutledge (Delporte, Fermi, Izsak, ect...) If you
pay attention, you can recognize the form of the Izsak crater, and its
position regards as the strange and huge object leant on the lunar
surface, not visible in the i_136_m.jpg image but visible in the photos
taken by Apollo 15-17 crews.
After all that
I strongly believe the Apollo 20 mission revealed by the presumed
William Rutledge, deserves the maxim attention of the scientific
community, because its implications could broaden the mankind's
horizons in every dimension, and also could reappraise the political
and religious ideologies which have been still bringing on suffering
and death on the Earth.
For example, the Delporte crater is to the North of the Izsak crater:
and in fact the Delporte's latitude is about -16° (16 deg S), when the
Izsak's latitude is about -23° (23 deg S), which makes perfectly sense.
So, it seems there is a contradiction in the subititles. Were the
subtitles made by mistake, inverting the data because of too much hurry
W. Rutledge told us in the interview
that some people (not him) made them in a hurry. So, it is possible a
mistake. It is also true that everything depends on what portion of the
object you consider as nose and what you consider as cockpit.
OTHER CONTRADICTIONS IN THE FOOTAGES
A gentleman from USA, Mr. Charles Gilbert Wright, wrote me at the end
of June because he found out that there is another contradiction that I
had not noticed. He gave me his kind written permission to mention him:
his discovery is analogous to that one I did about the audio coming
from Apollo 11 lift-off, and put together to the presumed Apollo 20
lift-off (Vandenberg AFB, August 1976).
The short audio
that we can hear watching the video named <<Apollo 20 legacy part
1 The City>>, www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbncnnygZwk,
uploaded by retiredafb on April 07, 2007 and that would be
"Apollo 20 MET 140 22 29 the unscheduled trasmission rover TV" by the
Station One, it comes from a radio communication of the Apollo 15
mission; you can check on the following link:
121:05:30 Allen: <<Presto chango; there's the TV.>>
121:05:36 Scott: <<Oh, beautiful, I'm glad to hear that.>>
It is just the audio, not the video, which is probably what W. Rutledge
claims. But again, why there is an audio contamination? In my opinion
it does not invalidate entirely his testimony. For example, if we give
a look to the presumed <<APOLLO 20 ALIEN SPACESHIP ON THE MOON
CSM FLYOVER>> video of the capsule interior, provided on YouTube
by "retiredafb" on June 24, 2007, we can see that it was shot in
a zero-gravity environment. We can argue that looking at the white
straps sticking straight out, as one friend of mine pointed out. From
the video that gravity is having no effect on the straps.
On the other hand, somebody could argue that the presumed Apollo
capsule is in a museum. But in this case, who gave the permission to
film such a fake? And why, if nobody is getting money from that?
The Apollo 20 case is still open. I hope the Rutledge’s outstanding
footages are a real effort of disclosure, in spite of there is
something of controversial and contradictory. If Apollo 19-20 missions took place indeed, other people involved could speak out for the advantage of the mankind.
UPDATING: AUGUST 6, 2007 THE IZSAK AND "IZSAK D" LUNAR CRATERS
I have almost for sure localized the "Izsak D" crater, the target for
the landing of the LM-15 of the presumed Apollo 20 mission (August
1976). At the beginning I was a little confused, because on a lunar map
the Iszak crater looks like the other crater near the huge and
mysterious cigar-shaped object leant on the lunar surface, on the
backside of the Moon. The name of the Izsak crater comes from Imre
Gyula Izsák(Zalaegerszeg, Hungary, 1929 - Paris, 1965), a
Hungarian-American astronomer expert of celestial mechanics.
The Izsak crater has the following features:
Latitude: -23.3° Longitude: 117.1° Diameter: 30 KM
But what about the "Izsak D"? But the "Izsak D" crater is not counted in the public lunar maps.
When we consider the official NASA picture AS15-P-9625 (taken on Apollo
15, 1971) where the curious object is visible, the Izsak crater is not
shown, but on the other hand the crater in the middle of the picture is
not explained or commented by NASA. That picture, which shows the
portion of lunar surface indicated by the lunar map (9625), has the
following details: Southwest of Delporte, North of Izsak; Latitude /
Longitude: 19° S / 117.5° E.
If we compare that picture
to the detail of the same zone of the lunar map available on the Lunar
and Planetary Institute, we can see the Izsak crater is out of the
borders of the picture. So, it means that the "Izsak D" crater
Mr. William Rutledge is reffering to, is probably the crater at the
center of the AS15-P-9625 image.
consideration is enough coherent with the presumed dimensions of the
spaceship (about 4 km long) and its dimensions and position regards as
the Izsak crater, which is to the South.