You will find that the LM-15, the Phoenix spacecraft according to
William Rutledge, has never flown and was scrapped.
W. Rutledge knows this detail of official space history, and has
pointed out in the interview
(see answer nr.13).
Detail of the AS15-M-1579 High Resolution Image, taken on
Apollo 15; camera altitude: 116 km; revolution: 38; Sun Elevation:
24°; Lens Focal Length: 3 inch.
Detail of the AS15-M-1333, rotated to the left. The crater
visible in the picture is almost for sure "Izsak D", which is
close to the larger Izsak crater (not visible here)
THE PRESUMED FLIGHT COURSE OF THE PHOENIX LUNAR MODULE BEFORE
RELEASED CONTROVERSIAL FOOTAGE ON YOUTUBE: LEAK OF INFORMATION OR
by Luca Scantamburlo
I am honoured to introduce you to the work by Haim
Ram Bar-Ilan, the Israeli designer and artist
who has already translated from English into Hebrew my
interview to William Rutledge.
You can find the interview on my website pages. See the link "interviews".
William Rutledge, whose nickname on YouTube is "retiredafb",
been claiming his identity since last Spring 2007: a former civilian
test pilot on various aircrafts, born in Belgium in 1930 and
employed in the last century with Avro, Chance Vought and
USAF. In August 1976 W. Rutledge was, according his testimony
granted to me in an interview, the Commander (CDR) of the Apollo
20 crew. That secret space mission was, always
according to the Rutledge's testimony, a joint US and Soviet mission
that followed by just over a year the joint Apollo-Soyuz
Project (ASTP), taken place in July 1975.
Since April 2007 W. Rutledge added on YouTube several video
footages which would come from the documentation material of that
mission. One of them on YouTube has the following title:<<ALIEN SPACESHIP ON THE MOON flyover
bef. landing APOLLO 20>>.
Haim Ram Bar-Ilan
(nicknamed "Rami") has
recently identified, in the video spread by W. Rutledge, the Lutke crater. Here you are on
this web page his first-rate reconstruction of the presumed flight
course of the LM-15, the Phoenix
Lunar Module. It would be the last revolution before descent. And as
a matter of fact, in the subtitles which go with the frames, we can
read: <<[...] and below os
Lutke>>. Of course "os" is a mistake: it would mean
"us". The subtitles, W. Rutledge told us, were not made by him (see
the interview). And, we can add, not made by an English mother
There are some controversial aspects in the Rutledge's
testimony and material. But I am convinced that the story deserves
our attention. Above all because of some difficulties I have met in
doing my researches as journalist (for the moment I prefer not to
spread them to the public).
Moreover, if the Apollo 19 (mysteriously failed with "a loss
of telemetry") and the Apollo 20 did take place indeed, we should be
very careful because it could begin a mass psychological warfare
campaign to destroy the testimony that William Rutledge gave us. If
he is honest, we must remember he is risking his life, maybe. I like
sharing my thoughts and considerations with some intelligent and
honest people of the world: we have concluded together that because
in the '70 years there was a huge and cigar-shaped object leant on
the far side of the Moon, on this one piece of evidence, Natural
Reason and Natural Law standing alone proves that we did go there.
Thirtyone years ago, man had the capability to go there. We knew
about the object from reconnaissance (by the Apollo 15 and Apollo 17
crews for sure, and perhaps even by the Soviet space probes).
Under Natural Law and Natural Reason, mankind had the
duty, as a categorical imperative, to go there and investigate the
mysterious object. You can be sure that it did happen. If it was not
Apollo 20, it was some other secret space mission. And if somebody
is skeptical about it, I invite him/her to read the Brookings'
report, prepared in November 1960 by the Brookings
Institution Washington, D.C.: <<Proposed
on the Implications of Peaceful Activities for Human
Affairs>>, The report, prepared for NASA, was
introduced to the Committe
on Science and Astronautics by the House of Representatives
of U.S.A. In the documents we can read:
<<[?] Historical and
empirical studies of the behavior of peoples and their leaders
when confronted with dramatic and unfamiliar events or social
pressures. Such studies might help to provide programs for meeting
and adjusting to the implications of such a discovery. Questions
one might wish to answer by such studies would include: How might
such information, under what cirucumstances, be presented or
withheld from the public for what ends? What might be the role of
the discovering scientists and other decisionmakers regarding
release of the fact of discovery?>>
from pag. 216, ibidem
So it is clear that in the past somebody suggested several
approaches and strategies about the steps to do in case of discovery
of extraterrestrial intelligence in our Solar System. Included the
possibility to withhold the truth of such a discovery "from the
Source: the subtitles of the "ALIEN SPACESHIP ON THE MOON flyover
bef. landing APOLLO 20", video added by "retiredafb" on YouTube.
Far side of the Moon
Nose: 17.3 deg S, 117.62 deg
Cockpit: 17.25 deg S, 117.62
Base: 17.20 deg S, 117.62
Are the coordinates right? Were they given inverted? The
longitude is coherent with the position of the huge object
(approximately 4 km long, according to the subtitles of the YouTube
video added by "retiredafb" (W. Rutledge). The problem is with the
latitude: not with the latitude data, but with their reference to
the major parts of the presumed "alien spaceship". Because we can
see the base of the object is to the South of the nose, we should
have, in my opinion, their reversal. It would be helpful to
listen the original radio communication.
The marks for the CSM DSKY are from the transcription of the
presumed dialogues between the Apollo 20 CDR and the Vandenberg Air
Force Base. The Phoenix crew members, according to the
"retiredafb"'s testimony, were A. Leonov and W. Rutledge. The base
of the "alien spaceship" (the huge object shown in the image) is
This Website contains analytics cookies and can contain cookies of
third parts! The visitor is informed and allows the use of the
cookies, otherwise, please abandon the Website or discharging this
function of allocation of cookies, acting on the configuration and
preferences of the browser navigation. For more information,
please go to the link privacy.